Mapping Research Trends in Global Climate Change Adaptation to Flood Disasters: A Bibliometric Analysis using VOSviewer

Authors

  • Muhammad Rizal Pahleviannur Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/innovative.v3i3.119

Keywords:

Climate Change Adaptation, Flood Disasters, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer, Resilience

Abstract

Using a bibliometric analysis, this study aims to map the research trends and thematic developments in climate change adaptation to flood disasters. Data from 812 publications, spanning from 1996 to 2023, were retrieved from the Scopus database and analyzed using VOSviewer software to visualize keyword co-occurrence networks. The analysis identified five key thematic clusters: adaptation strategies and resilience (180 publications), urban planning and green infrastructure (150 publications), flood risk management (85 publications), early warning systems (60 publications), and socio-economic impacts such as health and displacement (100 publications). Over time, research output has significantly increased, particularly after 2015, with publications peaking at 150 in 2023. Regionally, Asia leads the research output with 200 publications, followed by Europe (180 publications) and North America (120 publications). The findings highlight a shift toward sustainable, nature-based solutions and the integration of advanced technologies such as machine learning in flood management. The increasing focus on the socio-economic dimensions of flood adaptation, particularly in vulnerable communities, underscores the need for more inclusive approaches. Future research should prioritize underrepresented regions, such as Africa and Latin America, and foster interdisciplinary collaboration to address the complex challenges of climate-induced floods.

References

Ashley, R. M., Garvin, S., Pasche, E., Vassilopoulos, A., & Zevenbergen, C. (2005). Towards integrated approaches to reduce flood risk in urban areas. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management, 158(3), 135-140.

Coumou, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2012). A decade of weather extremes. Nature Climate Change, 2(7), 491–496.

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342.

Few, R., Ahern, M., Matthies, F., & Kovats, S. (2004). Floods, health and climate change: A strategic review. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.

Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013). Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 802-806.

Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., & Kanae, S. (2013). Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 816–821.

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Kabisch, N., Haase, D., & Haase, A. (2016). Urban green spaces and the potential for health improvement and environmental justice in European cities. Cities, 58, 103-113.

Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N. W., Döll, P., Jimenez, B., Miller, K. A., ... & Shiklomanov, I. A. (2014). Freshwater resources and their management. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.

Mercer, J. (2010). Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: Are we reinventing the wheel? Journal of International Development, 22(2), 247–264.

Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water, 10(11), 1536.

Ranger, N., Millner, A., Dietz, S., Fankhauser, S., Lopez, A., & Ruta, G. (2011). Adaptation in the UK: a decision-making process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1942), 216-233.

Satterthwaite, D., Huq, S., Pelling, M., Reid, H., & Lankao, P. R. (2007). Adapting to climate change in urban areas: The possibilities and constraints in low-and middle-income nations. International Institute for Environment and Development.

Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1794), 20190120.

Thakuriah, P., Tilahun, N., & Zellner, M. (2017). Seeing cities through big data: Research, methods and applications in urban informatics. Springer.

UNDRR. (2020). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2020. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.

Van Raan, A. F. J. (2014). Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(4), 261-272.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Pahleviannur, M. R. (2024). Mapping Research Trends in Global Climate Change Adaptation to Flood Disasters: A Bibliometric Analysis using VOSviewer. Innovative Technologica: Methodical Research Journal, 3(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.47134/innovative.v3i3.119

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.